I presented a big list of little tips at the recent OVUM conference on ITSM in London:
Here’s the slides OVUM presentation 20 tips
Plus Some additional short tips
- If you are going to do an ITSM project, clarify what it will deliver for your organisation
- Somehow the myth that ITIL is a panacea still prevails – dispel it
- No matter what anyone says, you can’t just buy ‘ITIL’ / ITSM off the shelf + do it in a few weeks
- You can achieve a lot of small targeted incremental service improvements in 30 days
- Getting a system running quickly isn’t a new cure-all, ITSM goodness takes time
- If you need funds for ITSM then define what this will deliver in simple business terms (1 slide?)
- Don’t be too ambitious for your ITSM project in terms of cost savings – it’s hard to quantify
- You can define benefits in terms of service quality + risk reduction, as well as cost benefit
- The way you set up your ITSM project is as important as how you deliver it – objectives, outcomes, project – people, skills, realistic planning
- If you don’t have a clear definition of what you do in IT, how can you know if you’re doing a good job?
- ITIL training will help staff to learn ITSM + use the same language, but won’t change the organisation
- There’s a whole group of people who just need an ITSM overview session rather than a 3 day foundation course
- The tech guys just need to be told what to do + what’s in it for them, don’t ask them to define strategy + processes
- For your Service Catalogue think (internal) IT services like email + support, + (external) business services that do what the organisation does
- SLM, SLAs + Service Catalogue – all must be done with customers – otherwise it’s old IT arrogance
- Let’s move our IT organisation from providing systems to delivering Services
- IT is + should be part of the business not a separate (necessary evil) function
- Let’s not think of running IT ‘as’ a business but ‘like’ a business – + part of it
- It’s the (project) process that counts with SLM – i.e. talking/listening to your customers
- ‘We did SLAs before + no-one was interested’ – no wonder if they were IT-only driven
- If your SLA document is more than a couple of pages then it’s an SLD – service level disagreement
- Don’t write SLAs as if you are writing a legal document – keep it simple + avoid IT jargon
- Don’t bother trying to do CMDB unless you are really sure why + for what result
- If you must do CMDB then don’t give the project to a tech person
- CMDB – be clear on your criteria for defining + storing CIs
- Too many well-meaning CMDB projects have failed by trying to do too much – ‘boiling the ocean’
- Actually, the whole concept of a single CMDB/CMS is flawed + in reality doesn’t exist
- Metrics in isolation are dangerously misleading – its an eco-system which needs balance
- We need services/SLAs to give our metrics + KPIs relevance, otherwise we get what suits us in IT
- KPIs without balance + business context simply drive compliant behaviour – maybe at cost to the business
- Don’t think that anyone cares about blanket 99.9% ‘availability’ – 100% when it matters is what matters
- If you are going to talk about 1st/2nd/3rd levels of support, you need to define what these mean
- Generally it’s faster, cheaper + better for the customer if incidents are fixed at the first contact
- Change + release management really are ‘no-brainers’, although doing them with common sense is still rare.
- Problem management is more about ownership than just process – give the right person the job
- The Problem Manager is part analyst, part investigator, but mostly project manager completer-finisher
- In IT we like to build models, tools + processes rather than just managing people + issues
- ITIL is documented common sense, which is stilll a rare commodity. It also needs good management to make it successful
- Culture eats strategy for breakfast, lunch and dinner’